The primary offender? The word "Empower."
If I see "Empower" in your H1 headline one more time, I'm calling the authorities. It is a felony in the jurisdiction of Crypto Jazz Hands.
"Empower" is where clarity goes to die. It is the linguistic equivalent of a participation trophy. It's a word used by people who are too afraid to promise a specific result, so they settle for a vague internal feeling.
I don't want to be empowered. I want to win. I don't want to be empowered. I want to solve a problem that is currently setting my hair on fire.
This is the Friday Clarity Shot. We are stripping the adjectives. We are burning the fluff. We are turning your word cloud into a weapon.
The Architecture of Apathy
Most founders think they are losing the "Algorithm War" because they didn't post at 8:02 AM on a Tuesday. Wrong. You're losing because you sound like a bot trained on a 2022 LinkedIn Growth Playbook. You are paying the Same-y Tax.
The Same-y Tax is the hidden cost of being indistinguishable. Every time you use a word like "seamless," "robust," or "innovative," your reach drops. Not because of a line of code in the algorithm, but because the human brain is hardwired to ignore patterns it has seen a thousand times before.
Politeness is a death sentence. In a world of infinite noise, the polite are invisible.
I see GTM Ghost Ships every day. Protocols with $40M in Series B funding, sailing into the sunset with zero users because their messaging is a crime against humanity. They talk about "fostering community" and "democratizing access."
It's corporate gibberish. It's safe. And safety is the most dangerous thing in crypto.
Why 'Empower' is a Felony
Let's perform an autopsy on this word.
Why is "Empower" so popular? Because it's a Vague Virtue. It describes an internal state without promising an external result. It's the ultimate "get out of jail free" card for a marketing team that doesn't understand the product.
"We empower users to take control of their data." "We empower developers to build the future." "We empower teams to collaborate seamlessly."
Do you feel that? That's the feeling of absolutely nothing happening.
When you say "Empower," you are putting the work on the user. You are saying, "Here is a tool, now you go do the hard part." It's lazy. It's a Messaging Crime because it lacks a Violent Verb.
The feed rewards the specific. It ignores the polite. If you want to cut through the noise, you have to stop decorating your sentences and start arming them.
The Violent Verb Manifesto
Go to your "About" page right now. Look at your headlines. If you find an adjective, kill it. If you find "Empower," burn the page.
I am replacing your "vague virtues" with Violent Verbs. This isn't about being mean — it's about being a catalyst. A catalyst doesn't "facilitate" change. It triggers a reaction.
"Arming" implies a weapon. It implies a struggle. It implies that the user has a target and your product is the thing that helps them hit it. "Empowering" implies a yoga retreat.
Which one do you think survives in a bear market?
The Messaging Crime Lineup: Most Wanted
These are the words that, if found in your pitch deck or landing page, should result in an immediate forfeiture of your seed round.
If your brand is built on these words, your brand is a ghost. It exists in the machine, but it has no soul. It has no edge.
The middle ground is the most dangerous place to be. In the current landscape, you either need to be the Definitive Primary Source or the Chaotic Interpretive Layer. Anything in between is just digital lint.
The 'Is This Real?' Test
A 3-step audit to see if your messaging is a crime or a catalyst.
Delete every adjective from your H1 and H2 headlines. Does the sentence still make sense? Does it still promise value? If it's empty, you have a word cloud, not a value proposition.
Take your last five posts. Change the logo to your biggest competitor's logo. Does it still work? If yes, you are paying the Same-y Tax. You are indistinguishable. You are losing.
Imagine your headline is screenshotted and posted in a Telegram group where everyone hates you. Do they laugh because it's vague and "visionary," or do they go quiet because it's a specific, undeniable truth?
If your messaging makes you sweat, good. That means you're getting close to something that matters.
Stop Being a Facilitator. Start Being a Catalyst.
The industry is full of facilitators. People who "help," people who "support," people who "foster."
I don't want to be helped. I want to be armed.
I started Crypto Jazz Hands because I was tired of the beige. I was tired of the GTM Ghost Ships sailing into the void while burning millions of dollars in VC funding. I am an expert at finding the Signal in the Noise. I don't care about your "brand guidelines" if those guidelines are built on a foundation of Messaging Crimes. I care about the Narrative. I care about the Rebellion.
The Digital Panopticon of "Best Practices" wants you to stay beige. It wants you to follow the playbook. It wants you to use words like "Empower" so you stay in your lane and don't disrupt the flow of mediocre content.
Break the glass.
Your product isn't "game-changing." It's a tool that solves a specific, painful problem. Talk about the problem. Talk about the solution. Use nouns. Use verbs.
Violent Verbs.
Stop being a facilitator. Start being a catalyst.
The feed rewards the specific. It ignores the polite.
The investigation continues. I'll be watching the feed. Don't let me catch you using "Empower." Consider yourself warned.
The Strategy is the Rebellion.
Ready to audit your messaging?
If you're ready to stop committing felonies against your own conversion rates, let's talk.
Start the Audit →